The Research
Evidence of harm related to technology use in schools is increasing.
UNESCO E-book: An Ed-Tech Tragedy?
COVID-19 pushed education from schools to screens at a pace and scale with no historical precedent. For many students, formal learning became dependent on digital technology.
This book examines the numerous adverse and unintended consequences of the shift to ed-tech, documents how digital-first solutions left a global majority of learners behind, and details how education was diminished even when tech was available/worked as intended.
C-SPAN: Lawmakers Hold Hearing on the Impact of Screen Time on Kids
On January 15, 2026, the Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee heard testimony from experts on the impact of screen time on children and young adults.
The witnesses said kids spend an average of five to eight hours a day on screens, warning it had fueled a mental health, learning, and creativity crisis.
Neuroscientist Jared Horvath said Generation Z--those born roughly between 1997 and 2012 is the first generation to underperform across every cognitive measure.
Witnesses urged Congress to act by banning artificial intelligence chatbots and companion apps for minors, implementing bans on phones and social media in schools during the school day, and enforcing changes to algorithms designed to keep children engaged.
Time Magazine: ChatGPT May Be Eroding Critical Thinking Skills, According to a New MIT Study
Does ChatGPT harm critical thinking abilities? A new study from researchers at MIT’s Media Lab has returned some concerning results.
The behavioral data revealed that higher levels of neural connectivity and internal content generation in the Brain-only group correlated with stronger memory, greater semantic accuracy, and firmer ownership of written work. Brain-only group, though under greater cognitive load, demonstrated deeper learning outcomes and stronger identity with their output. The Search Engine group displayed moderate internalization, likely balancing effort with outcome.
The LLM group, while benefiting from tool efficiency, showed weaker memory traces, reduced self-monitoring, and fragmented authorship. This trade-off highlights an important educational concern: AI tools, while valuable for supporting performance, may unintentionally hinder deep cognitive processing, retention, and authentic engagement with written material. If users rely heavily on AI tools, they may achieve superficial fluency but fail to internalize the knowledge or feel a sense of ownership over it.
New York Times: Dependence on Tech Caused ‘Staggering’ Education Inequality, U.N. Agency Says
Heavy reliance on online remote learning during the pandemic drew attention away from more equitable ways of teaching children at home, a UNESCO report says.
Santa Barbara Independent: Santa Barbara Students Exposed to Trauma on School Tablets
Parents and School District Working Toward Stronger Security Measures for Classroom Devices
Bloomberg News: Google LLC is unlawfully using its products—ubiquitous in K-12 education—to secretly gather information about school age children, substituting the consent of the school for that of parents
Google LLC is unlawfully using its products—ubiquitous in K-12 education—to secretly gather information about school age children, substituting the consent of the school for that of parents, a proposed class action filed in California federal court said Monday.
The tech giant collects not only traditional education records “but thousands of data points that span a child’s life,” and “neither students nor their parents have agreed to this arrangement, according to the US District Court for the Northern District of California complaint.
The Tech Buzz: Google's leaked docs reveal Chromebook plan to lock in kids
Internal presentations show Google views schools as pipeline for lifetime loyalty.
Research shows benefits are device- and use-case-specific, and often require teacher education.
Delia Hillmayr, Lisa Ziernwald, Frank Reinhold, Sarah I. Hofer, Kristina M. Reiss, “The potential of digital tools to enhance mathematics and science learning in secondary schools: A context-specific meta-analysis,” Computers & Education, Volume 153, 2020.
→ Impact is best measured tool by tool, use case by use case. Ed tech tools are not useful for drills (eg, Happy Numbers, Reflex Math). Dependent on substantive teacher training, they can be useful for tutoring.
Caroline Hall, Martin Lundin, “Technology in the classroom: Personal computers and learning outcomes in primary school,” Economics of Education Review, Volume 100, 2024.
→ Sweden-based study finds no observable effect of computers for language and math test scores.
Santiago Cueto, Diether W. Beuermann, Julian Cristia, Ofer Malamud, Francisco Pardo, “Laptops in the long run: Evidence from the one laptop per child program in rural Peru,” Journal of Public Economics, Volume 252, 2025.
→ A long-term randomized evaluation of the One Laptop Per Child program in Peru finds no significant effects on academic performance or educational attainment; computer access improved students’ computer skills but not their cognitive skills.
Change is happening.
Additional resources.
Screen Sense https://www.screensense.org/
Distraction Free Schools California https://www.distractionfreeschoolsca.org/
Smartphone Free Childhood US https://smartphonefreechildhoodus.com/
Schools Beyond Screens https://www.schoolsbeyondscreens.com/
Berkeley Unplugged https://www.berkeleyunplugged.org/
TechWell https://www.stepintolife.org/